The fact is that the background check and waiting period included in the Brady Bill would not have prevented John Hinckley from legally purchasing the handgun used in that incident. Records show that "a police background was run on Hinckley four days before he purchased the revolver he used to shoot President Reagan and Jim Brady. The check showed he had no felony convictions in any jurisdiction.
Neither had Hinckley any public record of mental illness" "Guns" An even greater shortcoming of the Brady Bill is that it only affects legal transactions. By definition, a criminal is someone who breaks the law.
Criminals have many ways to obtain weapons without going through the process mandated by the Brady Bill. Two obvious examples are theft and black market purchases.
According to studies "only one firearm of every six used in a crime is obtained legally" Thomas Since the passage of the Brady Bill, only four felons have been apprehended trying to purchase a firearm NRA, "Grassfire". In view of the facts presented, it is obvious that the Brady Bill is not an effective crime prevention tool.
The Brady Bill is not effective in fighting crime, but it does affect crime victims. The five-day waiting period during which the police conduct the background check is also supposed to serve as a "cooling off" period to prevent crimes of passion.
Fortunately, this five-day wait is waived in states like Virginia which have an instant background check system in place. The following article is an example of how waiting periods affect crime victims: Rayna Ross of Woodbridge, Virginia, might be dead if a waiting period had been in effect.
Instead, the instant check system in place in that state allowed her to defend her life against a former boyfriend three days after she purchased a pistol. The man, a Marine under orders to stay away from Ross because of previous assaults and threats, broke through a door and rushed into her bedroom with a bayonet. Ross fired twice, mortally wounding him. The shooting was ruled to be a case of self-defense "Armed Citizen". If the five-day waiting period had been in effect, it is likely that an innocent woman would have been killed.
During the debate in Congress over the passage of the Brady Bill, supporters claimed passing the bill would be worth it "if it saved just one life. Another example of gun control legislation that affects the wrong people is the "Assault Weapon" ban included in the Crime Bill of While supporters of the ban claim the firearms banned by this bill are the "weapons of choice" of gangs and drug dealers, the FBI Uniform Crime Reports show this contention is unfounded Rusiecki 7.
However, at Congressional hearings held on March 31of this year, several people testified that they had used guns which are now banned to defend their lives and to prevent crimes "Survival". It is fortunate that these citizens had firearms to defend themselves. Society does not benefit from the death or serious injury of innocent citizens. As mentioned earlier, crime is not the only issue related to firearms ownership.
Hunting is a popular sport and, in some parts of the country, an important source of food. On the surface, it might appear that hunting is harmful to wildlife and the environment. The fact is that the opposite is true. Wildlife biologists have found that well managed and regulated hunting programs are beneficial to wildlife. If the wildlife population becomes too large, food becomes scarce and the population starves to death.
Wildlife biologists take counts of game animals in a given area and study the habitat to determine the population level it can support. Then they make recommendations to State Game and Fish officials who set hunting seasons and bag limits. Hunting is a tool used by these officials to manage the wildlife under their care "Arizona" Non-game wildlife is also protected by hunters, and even by firearms owners who do not hunt. More than three billion dollars have been raised from these sources and used to protect both game and non-game animals Firearms ownership is clearly beneficial to the environment and a good environment is beneficial to everyone.
Firearms are also used in competitive sports. The Olympic Games include competitions with pistols, rifles, and shotguns. Shooting is also part of the biathlon and has been part of the Olympic pentathlon since "Pentathlon". There are also many competitions throughout the country in bull's eye, bench rest, silhouette, practical pistol, trap and skeet, and other shooting sports.
Men, women, older children, and even individuals with certain disabilities can enjoy these sports since shooting does not require much agility or physical strength.
Even without formal competition, shooting can be enjoyed as a hobby. Recreational shooting may involve paper targets, tin cans, or other suitable targets. This hobby can be enjoyed at indoor target ranges, but is usually practiced outdoors. In fact, shooting can often be combined with other enjoyable outdoor activities, such as hiking, camping, and sight seeing. Shooting is a relatively inexpensive activity which the entire family can enjoy. With close supervision, children can be taught to shoot.
Learning how to shoot safely means learning about responsibility, and the time spent teaching a child to shoot is quality time. When a child is ready, they may be allowed to shoot with less supervision. When this time comes, the child knows they have earned their parent's trust and they gain a sense of self-confidence.
For example, you can try and convince a pro gun control lobbyist that strict regulations are not the answer to a problem. Evidently, gun control as an essay topic gives the most fertile ground for persuasive and argumentative essays. So, these are the most common kinds of essays that students have to write on gun control. Usually, an exciting argumentative essay starts with a controversial topic that suggests two or more polar opinions on it.
With gun control, it should not pose any problem. You do have to avoid any emotional language, but you still need to have your own argument on the issue. Given the controversial nature of the topic, this should also pose no problem: The next thing you do is collect evidence to support your argument.
This may include collecting evidence in support of the opposing argument for you to rebuke. There is a lot of material on both sides of the argument, so even an extensive research for your gun control argumentative essay should not be too challenging. Once you have conducted your research, it is time to start writing. Just as any other essay, an argumentative essay on gun control comprises of three parts: In the introducing paragraph, you present your topic to the reader by giving some relevant background information and stating your standpoint on the issue in your thesis statement.
The main body of your essay will consist of three parts: In the conclusion of your gun control argumentative essay, you briefly re-state your standpoint and why it is the right one. Persuasive essays are largely similar to argumentative ones, so much that it may be difficult to pinpoint the difference at first.
This difference mainly lies in the ways by which you prove the rightness of your claim. Let us take a closer look at these ways. The commonly accepted classification suggests three main methods of persuasion: Logos employs logic to appeal to the reader's rationality. Pathos uses the irrational and appeals to emotion. Ethos employs authority and appeals to the sense of ethics. As we have mentioned, an argumentative essay focuses on proving the rightness of your argument rationally - so, it employs logos as the only method of persuasion.
In a persuasive essay, on the other hand, you focus on your result - persuading your reader. Thus, you can employ whichever of the three methods of persuasion you like in any combination. When we talk specifically about gun control, it is a heavily emotional topic, so it is hard to stick to dry facts and logic exclusively. So, when writing a gun control persuasive essay, not only logical but also ethical and emotional appeal is probably much easier than writing an argumentative essay and sticking to logic.
Consequentially, an argumentative essay suggests that you use neutral language at all times, whereas in a persuasive essay you can relax and write in moderately emotional language here and there. The writing and pre-writing processes for a persuasive essay will not be different from those for an argumentative one: As we have discussed, gun control is an extremely broad and multi-angled topic. Naturally, it is much bigger than one can cover in any essay, and you can investigate this topic in a gun control research paper or even bigger academic papers.
If you choose to write a research paper on gun control, however, you will still find that the topic is too broad and you will have to narrow it down according to your personal and academic interest. Still, if you find a particular gun control-related topic interesting, it is not enough to make a good topic for a research paper.
It also has to be original, i. On the bright side, you usually will not have to pick a fixed topic and stick to it. At the initial stage of your work, you can formulate your subject somewhat vaguely and specify and adjust the topic to your liking with the course of your research.
Another distinct feature of a research paper is that it needs a presentable list of referenced sources. You do not have to stick to other authors' writing here. You are also allowed often even encouraged to get and use your own empirical findings. One final thing that you need to know about a research paper is that it needs to focus on the research data - facts and analytics, rather than opinions and reflections - your own or those of other authors.
Gun control is one of those topics that encourage us to be biased and express opinions. Hence, there are lots of opinions on gun control out there - both pro and anti, - and most probably, you have one as well. However, when you are writing an academic paper, you cannot make your writing strictly opinion-based. Regardless of what kind of assignment you are writing, everything you write there has to refer to hard evidence.
In other words, any kind of paper on gun control demands profound research. You need to be well informed about the background of the issue and both sides of the argument.
As you know, the very issue of individual firearm possession and its control date back to the late 18 th century and the famous Second Amendment.
So, this is where you begin your research you should be familiar with the text of the Second Amendment. The paper begins with an introduction which highlights what the entire essay will be about.
Then, three body paragraphs follow: The firearms debate is something that has been going for a while, and in light of increased mass shootings and a higher risk of terrorist threats, it will continue to be a hot topic. Here at Essay Service, we have put together a handy guide to help you with creating any type of essay on this controversial subject. The problem of mass shootings has been on the rise around the world, with the United States being the most affected. A report published by The Guardian in showed that in the United States, there are million guns compared to the million adults living in the country.
The gun control law aims at regulating the manufacture, possession, transfer or use of firearms by civilians. The use of guns is something that has to be regulated to maintain safety for everyone.
Pro campaigners argue that with increased mass shootings and easy access to firearms, make it too difficult to prevent this kind of tragedies. Anti-gun control crusaders argue that due to the failure of the governments to ensure their safety, they are forced to acquire guns to defend themselves. However, some pro-gun control campaigners argue that gun ownership should be limited to the police and army officers due to the increased shootings in high schools and colleges.
The report published by The Guardian revealed that there are 30, gun deaths in the US annually , the highest across the globe. One of the pro-gun control arguments is that the law on gun ownership must be amended to control how guns are used and stored. They link the increased shootings in schools to unsafe storage of firearms. Although anti-gun control crusaders argue that the guns will ensure their safety, there have been instances where innocent people were hurt injured and even killed.
The pro-gun control campaigners advocate changing the constitution to either monitor the use of guns or totally ban gun possession among civilians. Also, parents and educationists have taken measures to educate children on the misuse of guns through lectures and open forums. One of the techniques professors use to educate students is by assigning them assignments to write an essay on gun control. That way, students can do adequate research and review existing literature before drafting the final gun control essay.
In recent years there has been increased education in schools and universities to ensure fewer chances of this kind of tragedies happening again. A typical exercise can involve giving students a gun control essay to research and write. This way the students can see what are the current laws and do research themselves into what problems can be affected if you change them. The law states that anyone in the U. Even tho there is Federal laws and local laws in place they can be confusing in some areas but generally, a version of the second amendment is followed.
The original text from the Bill of Rights which was later edited and ratified as the Second Amendment is as follows:. It is an important part of your essay to include a catchy title, this will inform the reader of your stance and also intrigue them to read further. It can also help other people look for your article quicker. If at first, you can not think of a title then it's a good idea to write as much of the essay and come back to naming it.
It should be a creative process and do not just rush in to label your work. Think of something different and fresh that could challenge the reader, so a question, for example, is a good way to do this.
Scholarly Essay: Gun Control There has been considerable debate recently in Canada over the issue of gun control. The Canadian parliament enacted the Firearms Act to enforce gun control by requiring gun owners to register their firearms. Gun control Introduction On July 12
Essay against Gun Control Gun control has been a hot topic for very long time. People on the anti-gun control side believe that gun ownership is a Constitutional right backed by the Second Amendment.
Persuasive gun control essay. A Criminologist's Case Against Gun Control by Jacob Davidson, Time. Davidson interviews James Jacobs, the director of the Center for Research in Crime and Justice at New York University School of Law, to pinpoint the definition of gun control as exactly as possible and to question the most popular approaches to. Against Gun Control Essay The problem of gun control is hotly debated nowadays. 50% of the population are for it explaining that having a gun provides them some protection. Because of various reasons our justice system cannot always protect us which is why the majority of people is looking for some other ways of.
A Criminologist’s Case Against Gun Control by Jacob Davidson, Time. Davidson takes a scholarly approach on the issue. He attempts to give a definition of gun control and critically scrutinize the most common gun control approaches and methods. Process gun control essay. In a process essay, you explain how to do something – for example. When writing the gun control essay introduction, utilize the title as a channel for presenting your viewpoint, the best way to implement this is by structuring the title to take the form of a question. Most important, ensure that your thesis is clear and answers the question.