Top 20 Evil Bible Stories. It's important to remember that many of these scholars consider themselves to be Christians and treat the works with respect even if they don't believe them to be fully historical.
I no longer believe the core beliefs of Christianity to be true, but I still appreciate reading the works of many of these scholars.
John Dominic Crossan has a unique perspective and has a deep knowledge of the social, cultural, and political issues happening during the first few centuries CE. I think many Christians would benefit from reading his works even if they don't agree with his conclusions about the bodily resurrection of Jesus.
I have a much greater appreciation for the literary devices used in the gospel of Mark. I think Richard Carrier said something to that effect in a recent debate.
Geoffrey of Ballard Quote. For I too have made quite a study of New Testament history, read a heap of different authors, and drawn some different conclusions to yours. One of the things I discovered is that there is a wide range of opinion among NT scholars, which raises questions about objectivity and which scholars to trust. In trying to base my beliefs whether believing or sceptical on facts, I felt I needed to base my conclusions on two classes of scholars:.
Most NT scholars that I have read seem to be in divinity schools, not history schools; hence they are perhaps more theologians than historians. And I feel it is this that makes them more prone to divergence of view.
There are obviously many scholars e. Craig Blomberg, LT Johnson who are well qualified, but who write from a christian apologetic position. However they may be helpful to christians, they are of less value when determining the objective facts. At the other extreme are scholars who start from sceptical assumptions, which makes them effectively sceptical apologists e. Bart Ehrman, the Jesus Seminar. They likewise are less useful for determining objective facts.
So I have tended to give less weight to scholars at both extremes, and take most notice of those most respected by their peers and clearly in the centre of scholarly opinion. My reading suggests that Crossan, Borg, Vermes, Sanders, Meier and Wright may be the most respected of the established scholars, with a few others beginning to gain a reputation.
Better still is to find ancient historians with a wider view than just the NT, who bring to the NT the same methods that they use on other documents of comparable date. Again we come to our differences. I find that these historians and scholars generally come to less sceptical views about the life of Jesus than you have outlined here and in your interesting Rediscovering Jesus post.
Once I have established who to trust, as in my previous comment, I should trust their judgment on historical matters, and then make my own personal judgment on what to believe. So here is a quick summary of what I have found these scholars to conclude:. But there are nearly five thousand manuscripts of the NT in Greek… The only surviving manuscripts of classical authors often come from the Middle Ages, but the manuscript tradition of the NT begins as early as the end of II CE; it is therefore separated by only a century or so from the time at which the autographs were written.
Thus it seems that NT textual criticism possesses a base which is far more advantageous than that for the textual criticism of classical authors. So the NT is reasonably reliable history compared ot other documents of the time. Despite this, we have a good idea of the main lines of his ministry and his message. We know who he was, what he did, what he taught, and why he died.
The late Michael Grant: The fact that Jesus existed, that he was crucified under Pontius Pilate for whatever reason and that he had a band of followers who continued to support him seems to be part of the bedrock of historical tradition.
If nothing more, the non-christian evidence can provide us with certainty on that score. He said and did a great many things that most historians are reasonably certain we can know about today. Anyone who says that today — in the academic world at least — gets grouped with the skinheads who say there was no Holocaust and the scientific holdouts who want to believe the world is flat.
Even so, the fact that, after his death and resurrection, his disciples proclaimed him as the Messiah can be understood as a direct development from his own teachings. For he also claimed that he himself could forgive sins.
What the reality was that gave rise to the experiences I do not know. That is a fairly comprehensive list — and note that Michael Grant was an eminent historian of the Roman period, author of more than 50 historical books only one about Jesus and he was not a believer.
On this basis, it seems to me that the most unbiased, respected and experienced historians and scholars provide good reasons to believe that we have good knowledge of the life of Jesus. And that is enough for me to base my faith in Jesus. I understand the need to trust scholars. And scholars do greatly disagree about the nature of the historical Jesus. In addition, it seems to be the mainstream scholarly view that Jesus was a Jewish apocalyptic prophet — a failed one, since the end of the world, once again, did not come.
So even the mainstream view of Jesus is rather damning of the grandiose claims of Christianity. I have no idea why you would think the gospels are eyewitness account. As for the textual reliability of the NT, it is indeed better than with any other ancient text, although even Christian scholars know there are probably a few dozen interpolations even when looking at our earliest manuscripts.
But this just means we have a particularly well-preserved myth. Again, this is just a brief reply to your message. It is the mission of this blog to explain what I mean in more detail and with more rigor as I publish my posts. But I appreciate every argument and piece of evidence you want to post here. And that is exactly what I have done. When I read the experts, they all have a slightly different slant — cynic philosopher, marginal Jew, apocalyptic prophet, true Messiah, etc. But that is interpretation, and what I am looking for from the experts is what they conclude are the historical facts.
BTW I think many are mistaken in their interpretation about the end of the world. I studied Matthew 24 long before I heard this view, and concluded that almost all of it applied to the immediate future; not to some end of the world, but the end of the Jewish world as they knew it.
But it is as well based as the other things I wrote. It could scarcely have been otherwise as 3 of the accounts were written down within about years of the events, based on earlier oral accounts. I will give you some more detail if you like, but I am going away for a few days, so it will have to wait until I get back. Again this is just not true. The experts have concluded the gospels are history and biography as understood in those days, though slightly different to how we would use those terms today.
How are the gospels not obvious myth? June 11th, by Christian Research Institute Type: Jesus as God This article first appeared in the Christian Research Journal, volume 31, number 4 Does the Bible Claim Jesus is God?
Did Jesus Claim to Be God? June 10th, by Christian Research Institute Type: Will we be resurrected at the same age that we died? Posts navigation 1 2 … 4 Next.
Factual Evidence to Support the Historicity of the Bible. Is Drinking Alcohol a Sin? This is the key to finding salvation in Christianity. The monotheistic people that still only believe in God, and not Jesus, and this makes them poor ideologically. But yet, this sermon goes on to bless all the different types of people, especially those who have had a hard life. Jesus is saying to have faith in God as He knows your needs and your troubles, and all will be taken care of in the Kingdom of God.
It is the resurrected Jesus who sends out the disciples with the Word for all the nations to hear. Even the resurrected Jesus was concerned with saving the world.
And that is why He sent out the disciples to all the nations. After the crucifixion and resurrection, the Holy Spirit was sent to the Apostles. This Spirit was always present to remind the disciples that Jesus came to save both the Jews and the Gentiles, and that God wants people from every nation and race to become His children.
All countries, all nationalities have now heard the Word of God. Christianity has become one of the most dominant religions in the world, and the time for the Kingdom of God draws near.
After studying the Gospels it becomes apparent that God wants all His children to come home, and so He made obtaining this redemption easily accessible for all people. Every person must individually receive Jesus Christ through faith as Savior and Lord: Most of these people believe Jesus to be a great moral teacher, but do not accept the divinity of his claim.
They do not believe, because they have no faith. This is increasing evident in our modernized technological society. Faith has been traded for science.
Due to inevitable prejudice and the scarcity of good evidence from Jesus’ time, modern scholars have a wide range of opinions on who the Historical Jesus was: Jesus the Myth, Jesus the Wisdom Sage, Jesus the Social Prophet, Jesus the Savior, Jesus the Hellenistic Hero, Jesus the .
Jesus' Public Ministry - Jesus' Public Ministry research papers tell the history of Jesus Christ and his teachings according to the Gospels. Jesus the Teacher - Jesus the Teacher research papers overview the teachings of Jesus according to the Gospels.
Jesus answered, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh . Jesus replied to them, well people do not need medicine, but those who are sick do. Jesus Christ is willing to accept all people regardless of their sins. That is why He visited the home of the hated tax collector and promises eternal life to the dying criminal. Jesus is forgiving, and loving, and he came to save all the people of the world.
Free research papers, free research paper samples and free example research projects on Jesus Christ topics are plagiarized. onlinepersonalloansforpeoplewithbadcredit.cf is professional research paper writing service which is committed to write top-quality custom research papers, term . Her research suggests Jesus may have stood at an average (for the time) 5 foot 5 inches ( meters) tall, with a possibly short mop of black hair, olive-brown skin and brown eyes.