The Death Penalty, along with all other forms of criminal punishment, is barbaric. This form of punishment, indeed all forms of criminal justice, truly shows the level to which society has sunk. When people stand outside prisons and cheer as prisoners are murdered, there is a problem.
When personal bloodlust is held above moral ideologies, there is a problem. When human life is assigned a value and weighed against other alternatives, there is a problem. The state speaks of Justice, but this word is only a reflection of the confusion, anger, and hatred that has fermented within this country, indeed within the very foundations of human society itself. Truly there is no purpose to the Death Penalty other than vengeance, yet it seems that our society has sunk to such a level that even vengeance is acceptable to most.
The state, though, mimics every abhorrent quality of a punishable act of murder; a murder committed in anger is punished with an execution committed in anger; a cold, calculated, murder committed with pleasure is met with the same form of execution.
The end result is the same and the feeling with which it is carried out is the same. There are, even, many qualities of the death penalty that surpass the moral obscenity of a criminal act of murder.
Where then is the difference between a murder and an execution? How can one form of murder be right and another be wrong? How can the same deed, carried out by two different people, be one time evil and another time divine? How, furthermore, can a morally adverse action promote the morality, let alone the continued existence, of human society? If we feel bad about explaining the Death Penalty to our children then we should not have to explain it at all.
There is a large majority of Christians in this country, yet such a small number of them actually come up in opposition to the Death Penalty; oftentimes, in fact, they are its most avid supporters.
How can this be? All the teachings of Christ, save for those which have been horribly twisted by his followers, are opposed to any form of criminal In five pages this essay refutes each of the arguments posed by proponents of California's death penalty.
There are four bibliogr In six pages this paper argues that the high probability of error is sufficient to abolish capital punishment in the United States As long as the death However, when a life is at stake, error is not an option. The death penalty is murder by the government. As a nation, we have prided ourselves in our government, its justice and truth. However, can we continue to call our government fair if we do not hold it to the same rules we do its people?
We consider that barbaric. Yet we continue to take life as a means of protecting life. Our natural rights as humans, which cannot be taken away by the government, include the right to life. Humans are not cold metal coins that lose value; no act, no matter how heinous, can make a person less of a human being. The death penalty is favored by some as an effective deterrent of crime; however, it is proven that states with the death penalty actually have higher murder rates than those without.
It is proven that our nation does not need this extreme threat of punishment to prevent crime. It can be said that the death penalty is the most overlooked form of government hypocrisy; we murder people who murder people to show that murder is wrong.
It is this contradiction in policy that confuses criminals and undermines any crime deterrence capital punishment was intended to have. Losing a loved one, no matter how that person is lost, is unbearable, irrevocable, and shattering. Nevertheless, when execution day arrives, the pain is not eased. No relief can be gained, for their pain is an unavoidable, natural process of life. Capital punishment is immoral and a violation of natural rights. It is wrong for everyone involved: We need to replace the death penalty and capital punishment with life without parole, a safer and more inexpensive option.
Nothing good comes of hate, and nothing good can ever come from capital punishment. It cannot continue to be accepted by a nation that claims to have liberty and justice for all. Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about? These links will automatically appear in your email.
If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. We try to make TeenInk. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message.
Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. Don't have an account? Sign up for one. Wrong email address or password! Summer Program Reviews College Reviews. Writers Workshop Regular Forums. Program Links Program Reviews. I like this 0. Giving Thanks for What?
Styx and Stones MAG. This article has comments. Email me when someone replies. Oh, so if they're so reasonable as to say "I'm so sorry, I'll never do that again", why did they do it in the first place?
When a murderer is released, you have endangered the lives of all those innocent people around it. And yes, even if it's prison for life, it's possible for them to be released be executives. It's possible for escape even if it's very unlikely. And that risk of harming truly innocent people is enough. Don't call others ignorant when you have contradicting statements first wanting to torture the murderer they're not tortured in jail they get tennis courts and then saying they can teach others lessons by playing tennis in jail and atone for their crimes.
The title is Arguments against the Death Penalty yet the author spent the whole time counterclaiming any arguments brought up rather than explaining the logistics behind the arguments. No side was taken in this essay however the title clearly states that the essay should be on arguments against.
(Religious Organizing Against the Death Penalty Website) The main argument that advocates for the death penalty have is that the death penalty deters crime, that the threat of execution is enough to make criminals think twice about committing a capital crime. /5(10).
Custom Against the Death Penalty Essay Writing Service || Against the Death Penalty Essay samples, help There are a number of issues that are considered controversial in our modern society. Some of these issues are death penalty, abortion and euthanasia. Debate against death penalty essaysThe death penalty has always been a very controversial issue. Death sentences are usually handed out to people who have been found guilty of capital crime. However it is not so easy to consider death penalty as an easy way to punish the guilty. If the death pena.
Against The Death Penalty Essay Words | 4 Pages. Against the Death Penalty “Murder is wrong” (“Capital Punishment”). We’ve been taught this indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is defined as one human taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder. The death penalty should be used less because of the murder rates are slowly dropping, Prejudice against the defendants, and the costs of the death sentence. A reason to stop the death sentencing is because the murder rates are slowly declining.